Let’s see: burning the U.S. flag is protected under the First Amendment, but not burning a Koran.
At least, that appears to be the reaction of Supreme Court Associate Justice Stephen Breyer. He speculated that, in this age of globalization, Koran burning could be compared to shouting ‘fire’ in a crowded theater.
So, if some radical imams in Pakistan or Egypt take offense at some cartoon which 99.99% of Americans believe to be inoffensive, where does Breyer draw the line?
Doesn’t he understand that ‘Muslim rage’ isn’t just a ‘natural’ reaction: that Muslim authorities can and should can be held responsible for either calming or inflaming the situation? Tawfiq Hamid last week in the Wall Street Journal (sorry, but I can’t link to it) laid out ways in which this could be done.
And why is it that a Supreme Court Justice doesn’t know this? Or, if he doesn’t, why doesn’t he inform himself before speaking out on the topic? (Thanks to CNS News.)
Have PoliticalMavens.com delivered to your inbox in a daily digest by clicking here